Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Renata Zarazua vs Susan Bandecchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zarazua vs Bandecchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Renata Zarazua vs Susan Bandecchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zarazua 0 - 0 Bandecchi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zarazua has won 48.76% of points on his second serve, while Bandecchi has won 46.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zarazua, in recent form, has won 55.09% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bandecchi has won 56.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.05% and 41.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zarazua has saved 53.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bandecchi has saved 55.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zarazua has won 60.98% of matches played (W/L 50/ 32), with Bandecchi winning 49.15% (W/L 29/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zarazua has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 185/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Bandecchi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 46/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Zarazua has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.63% of matches (W/L 42/ 22), where as Bandecchi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 25/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zarazua has played against opponents with an average rank of 231.82 while Bandecchi has played against players with an average rank of 360.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zarazua has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bandecchi has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zarazua has converted 51.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bandecchi has converted 47.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
102
Rank
97
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
344
Rank
164
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
57% (328-251)
Career Total W/L
57% (259-193)
48% (14-15)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$320,537
Career Prize Money
$93,621
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Renata Zarazua | Susan Bandecchi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (14/15) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (35/34) | 49% (27/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (331/320) | 52% (268/243) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 57% (8/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:27 | 1:52:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 187.93 | 405.22 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (1493/2044) | 71% (1138/1608) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (873/1493) | 60% (683/1138) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (261/551) | 46% (218/470) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (126/251) | 49% (102/207) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (944/2088) | 48% (760/1599) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 52% (12/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (13/28) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (4/12) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (17/12) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (17/5) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 17% (12/2) |
Renata Zarazua Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Madison Keys
Player
Renata Zarazua
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Renata Zarazua
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Peyton Stearns
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Ajla Tomljanovic
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve %
40%
(
4 of
10)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
15
Total Points Won
7
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Viktorija Golubic
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve %
78%
(
29 of
37)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Renata Zarazua
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
77%
(
82 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
45%
(
48 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Renata Zarazua
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Renata Zarazua
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Susan Bandecchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Susan Bandecchi
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Tatiana Pieri
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Susan Bandecchi
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Lisa Pigato
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
81%
(
21 of
26)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Susan Bandecchi
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
53%
(
47 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Fiona Ganz
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Susan Bandecchi
72%
(
86 of
120)
1st Serve %
73%
(
88 of
120)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
88)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
48%
(
58 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
120
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Nika Radisic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Susan Bandecchi
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zarazua Vs Bandecchi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Susan Bandecchi
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
